Evidence lineage
Classify dated, permissioned records separately from assumptions, modeled estimates and customer assertions.
Independent product pathway · scoped demonstrations
CONFORM: test the strength of claims and evidence.
Evidence sufficiency, provenance and uncertainty review for equipment vendors, performance claims, technical diligence and complex operating decisions. Inspect how evidence may support PASS, FAIL or UNCERTAIN recommendations, with explicit abstention when proof is missing.
Buyer workflow
Designed for a decision you can evaluate.
Decision boundaries
Review calibration, missing evidence, source conflicts, freshness and uncertainty before any conclusion.
Vendor proof pilot
Design a blinded evaluation using agreed ground truth, false-PASS controls, disagreement and reproducible acceptance metrics.
Current evidence boundary
CONFORM currently has a research and controlled demonstration workflow; an independently deployed public client-facing demo and third-party accreditation have not been verified. Its labels are internal decision-support states, not regulatory certification, settlement assurance or independent professional audit.
Design-partner validation
Trusta seeks a narrowly scoped, preferably paid design-partner pilot with a named decision owner, baseline, evidence permissions, measurable acceptance criteria, and agreed reporting. University or independent lab participation can be arranged when it provides useful validation; no partnership is implied until confirmed.
Start with non-confidential information only. Pricing and any handling of private operating data require a written proposal, signed agreement and approved secure intake. No meeting or purchase is created by clicking the email link.